If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. https://online.jamschool.ru/users/baconmatch5/activity/40761/ for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.