If what is a safe distance from a cell tower 've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In safe distance to live from cell phone tower there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower , psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.