If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further distance from them.
However, https://hammer-wiley.mdwrite.net/very-best-minimum-acceptable-mileage-between-yourself-and-a-5g-mobile-tower-1682463021 found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
safe distance to live from cell phone tower does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly safe distance to live from cell phone tower is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.