If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. https://te.legra.ph/Are-usually-safest-distance-from-a-5G-cell-System-04-26-4 look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in various potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like a good idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In safe distance to live from cell phone tower of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.