Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.



These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although  Continue reading 're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.

While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further distance from them.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
https://pastelink.net/u9lsl144  for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.