If https://campbell-bruun.technetbloggers.de/very-best-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-structure-1682482347 've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. safe distance to live from cell phone tower would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For safe distance from cell tower , co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.